Failure to Comply with Discovery Order Results in Dismissal with Prejudice and Monetary Sanctions

Six claimants asserted causes of action for suitability, churning, failure to supervise, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, unauthorized trading, negligence, misrepresentation and omission of facts. However, after failing to comply with the Panel’s orders related to the production of discovery, the claimants’ claims were dismissed with prejudice and monetary sanctions in the form of attorney fees were imposed. 

_{Case Law Alerts, 3rd Quarter, July 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright © 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.}