Date range

Court held a defendant-contractor owed duty of care to plaintiff, a third party, based on Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 324A and 383, and this duty extends to reasonably foreseeable risks arising from the performance of contractual obligations.

The plaintiff, as he walked to his delivery truck Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2021 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of int

District Court dismisses claim for insurance benefits against employer, finding it was the plan administrator, not the employer, who made the benefits determination.

This matter arises from the plaintiff’s claim under Section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), seeking to recover insurance Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2021 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent developments of int