Publications
WHAT’S HOT IN WORKERS’ COMP - NEWS AND RESULTS*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
The Delaware Superior Court affirms a decision of the Industrial Accident Board that denied the employer’s motion to enforce a commutation.
Ms. Stansbury was injured in a work accident on February 25, 2020. The employer acknowledged a left shoulder injury, but disputed injuries to the cervical and lumbar spines.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
In order to rely on the pay and investigate provision of Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Statute, a letter must be sent and must be sent timely.
The injured worker, a rest area attendant, mixed a solution for cleaning that allegedly exploded in her face, causing an immediate chemical reaction, on November 1, 2020. The claim was accepted as compensable on November 13, 2020.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
New Jersey Legislative Update
Here are updates to pending New Jersey workers’ compensation legislation reported in our May 2023 edition.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that claimant’s dram shop claim arose out of maintenance or use of a motor vehicle; therefore, employer was precluded from subrogating its payment of Heart and Lung Act benefits against claimant’s settlement of the claim.
In this case, the claimant, a police officer, sustained multiple injuries when his patrol car was struck by an intoxicated driver’s vehicle. The employer accepted liability for the injuries.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
WHAT’S HOT IN WORKERS’ COMP - NEWS AND RESULTS*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
What's Hot in Workers' Comp - Special DE Alert
New Workers’ Compensation Rate Effective July 1, 2023
What's Hot in Workers' Comp – Special DE Alert – June 16, 2023,
The Superior Court affirms a decision of the Industrial Accident Board that concluded Superior Court Civil Rule 41(a)(1)’s ‘Two Dismissal’ rule did not apply to an IAB proceeding.
The claimant was injured in a work accident on October 28, 2018.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
Regardless of whether a second opinion is reasonable or medically necessary, if a referral is made, it must be acknowledged within the applicable three or ten-day period or the defense of medical necessity is waived.
The claimant sought authorization of a second opinion, as recommended by the treating physician. The claimant conceded that the doctor ultimately testified that the second opinion was not medically necessary.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.
The New Jersey Supreme Court affirms the Appellate Division’s decision to reverse the trial court and reinstate the jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor.
In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division’s decision to reverse the trial judge’s decision to vacate the jury verdict and award judgment to Marine Transport, Inc.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 27, No.