Presented by the Public Entity and Civil Rights Litigation Practice Group

Security Camera Video from Elementary School Had to Be Produced Pursuant to OPRA

In the recent case of Zezza v. Evesham Twp. Bd. of Educ., A-0537-21 (June 29, 2023), a citizen requested 35 seconds of surveillance footage taken from two cameras on the premises of Rice Elementary School in Evesham Township that captured an alleged assault. The plaintiff sought the video surveillance, pursuant to the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and the common law right of access, and submitted an OPRA request to the school district. The school district denied the request, stating that the security footage was exempt from production pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.112.

The plaintiff then filed an order to show cause. The trial court ordered the defendant to produce the surveillance video and found that the plaintiff was a prevailing party, entitled to attorney’s fees and costs. The defendant filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied, and additional fees were awarded to plaintiff’s counsel.

The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that there was not a blanket exception for all surveillance videos pursuant to Gilleran v. Twp. of Bloomfield, 227 N.J. 159 (2016). The Appellate Division found that pursuant to Gilleran, surveillance footage is barred from disclosure if there is a public security concern that access would reveal security-compromising information. Thus, the burden is on the governmental entity to establish that the denial of access is authorized by law. Here, the defendant failed to meet its burden and the production of the video surveillance, along with the fee award, was affirmed by the Appellate Division. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss any issue under the OPRA. I can be reached at 856-414-6048 or you can email me at mjbehr@mdwcg.com.

 

 

Legal Updates for New Jersey Public Entity & Civil Rights, July 2023, has been prepared for our readers by Marshall Dennehey . It is solely intended to provide information on recent legal developments, and is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. We welcome the opportunity to provide such legal assistance as you require on this and other subjects. If you receive the alerts in error, please send a note tamontemuro@mdwcg.com. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. © 2023 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved.