Publications
A judge of compensation claims must be specific when awarding non-professional attendant care to a family member.
The claimant petitioned for attendant care benefits to be paid to her husband. The judge of compensation claimant ordered the employer/carrier to pay him for 30 hours per week at the federal minimum wage.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
The Appellate Division reversed and remanded a trial court order denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint and dismissed their matter with prejudice.
The plaintiffs had filed a complaint for survival and wrongful death against the defendants, asserting the defendants caused the decedents to become infected with COVID-19 and pass away in March 2020.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Appellate Division finds that compulsion in an activity could render it a non-social or recreational activity.
The petitioner had worked for the respondent since 2007. On December 14, 2013, he reported for mandatory snow duty and as a result, he had to stay at the assigned Marriott Hotel for 12 hours and work the other 12 hours.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Pharmacy staffed by pharmacist provided by an employee leasing agency is a provider as defined by Section 109 of the Act. When a physician has ownership interest in said pharmacy, a referral to the pharmacy violates the Act’s self-referral prohibition.
In this case, 700 Pharmacy filed five Fee Review Applications for prescriptions for the claimant. The Hearing Officer dismissed all of the applications on the grounds of an illegal self-referral.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
What’s Hot In Workers’ Comp - News and Results*
NEWS
RESULTS*
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Delaware Supreme Court affirms the decisions of the IAB and Superior Court, holding that an employer CORRECTLY paid for ketamine infusion treatment in accordance with the Delaware Fee Schedule.
Ms. Taylor injured her right wrist in 2016 while working as a teacher for the State. Her injury eventually developed into complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) involving multiple extremities.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Reporting an injury via a Petition for Benefits within 30 days of the alleged accident does not fulfill the notice requirement.
The claimant, a senior claims adjuster, worked remotely in Orlando and once a quarter went to Tallahassee to the employer’s office. He typically was picked up by a rental car company.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Appellate Division vacated and remanded a trial court order denying employer’s application for satisfaction of its workers’ compensation lien as premature after the third party settlement.
In October 2019, Darshelle Joseph was injured while working for NJ Transit and filed a workers’ compensation case and a third party case against the tortfeasor.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Appellate Division finds that paid status during a break does not mandate workers’ compensation coverage and affirmed the dismissal of the claim.
The petitioner appealed the dismissal of her workers’ compensation claim. She was working for the respondent as a dispatcher, and on her meal break in October 2018, she was rear-ended.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.
Excluding counsel fees from payment of future medical benefits based on future medical expenses as speculative is contrary to Sec. 306(f.1)(7) of the Act, which prohibits provider from billing claimant for any costs relating to care under the Act.
In this case, a workers’ compensation judge granted in part and denied in part the claimant’s Petition to Review. The judge also approved a 20% Fee Agreement between the claimant and her counsel, but as to indemnity benefits only.
What’s Hot in Workers’ Comp, Vol. 28, No.